Validity and everyday clinical applicability of lumbar muscle fatigue assessment methods in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review

Jorge H. Villafañe, Massimiliano Gobbo, Matteo Peranzoni, Ganesh Naik, Grace Imperio, Joshua A. Cleland, Stefano Negrini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic literature review aimed at examining the validity and applicability in everyday clinical rehabilitation practise of methods for the assessment of back muscle fatiguability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP). Methods: Extensive research was performed in MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from their inception to September 2014. Potentially relevant articles were also manually looked for in the reference lists of the identified publications. Studies examining lumbar muscle fatigue in people with CNSLBP were selected. Two reviewers independently selected the articles, carried out the study quality assessment and extracted the results. A modified Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) scale was used to evaluate the scientific rigour of the selected works. Results: Twenty-four studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review. We found conflicting data regarding the validity of methods used to examine back muscle fatigue. The Biering-Sorensen test, performed in conjunction with surface electromyography spectral analysis, turned out to be the most widely used and comparatively, the most optimal modality currently available to assess objective back muscle fatigue in daily clinical practise, even though critical limitations are discussed. Conclusions: Future research should address the identification of an advanced method for lower back fatigue assessment in patients with CNSLBP which, eventually, might provide physical therapists with an objective and reliable test usable in everyday clinical practise.Implications for RehabilitationDespite its limitations, the Biering-Sorensen test is currently the most used, convenient and easily available fatiguing test for lumbar muscles.To increase validity and reliability of the Biering-Sorensen test, concomitant activation of synergistic muscles should be taken into account.Pooled mean frequency and half-width of the spectrum are currently the most valid electromyographic parameters to assess fatigue in chronic non-specific low back pain.Body mass index, grading of pain and level of disability of the study population should be reported to enhance research quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Muscle Fatigue
Back Muscles
Low Back Pain
Fatigue
Databases
Muscles
Physical Therapists
Electromyography
Research
Reproducibility of Results
MEDLINE
Patient Selection
Observational Studies
Publications
Epidemiology
Body Mass Index
Nursing
Rehabilitation
Pain
Health

Keywords

  • Electromyography
  • fatigue
  • low back pain
  • lumbar muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Validity and everyday clinical applicability of lumbar muscle fatigue assessment methods in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain : a systematic review. / Villafañe, Jorge H.; Gobbo, Massimiliano; Peranzoni, Matteo; Naik, Ganesh; Imperio, Grace; Cleland, Joshua A.; Negrini, Stefano.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, 09.2016, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{310d2b4bd4724a6ebc5e8862e484e167,
title = "Validity and everyday clinical applicability of lumbar muscle fatigue assessment methods in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review",
abstract = "Purpose: This systematic literature review aimed at examining the validity and applicability in everyday clinical rehabilitation practise of methods for the assessment of back muscle fatiguability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP). Methods: Extensive research was performed in MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from their inception to September 2014. Potentially relevant articles were also manually looked for in the reference lists of the identified publications. Studies examining lumbar muscle fatigue in people with CNSLBP were selected. Two reviewers independently selected the articles, carried out the study quality assessment and extracted the results. A modified Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) scale was used to evaluate the scientific rigour of the selected works. Results: Twenty-four studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review. We found conflicting data regarding the validity of methods used to examine back muscle fatigue. The Biering-Sorensen test, performed in conjunction with surface electromyography spectral analysis, turned out to be the most widely used and comparatively, the most optimal modality currently available to assess objective back muscle fatigue in daily clinical practise, even though critical limitations are discussed. Conclusions: Future research should address the identification of an advanced method for lower back fatigue assessment in patients with CNSLBP which, eventually, might provide physical therapists with an objective and reliable test usable in everyday clinical practise.Implications for RehabilitationDespite its limitations, the Biering-Sorensen test is currently the most used, convenient and easily available fatiguing test for lumbar muscles.To increase validity and reliability of the Biering-Sorensen test, concomitant activation of synergistic muscles should be taken into account.Pooled mean frequency and half-width of the spectrum are currently the most valid electromyographic parameters to assess fatigue in chronic non-specific low back pain.Body mass index, grading of pain and level of disability of the study population should be reported to enhance research quality.",
keywords = "Electromyography, fatigue, low back pain, lumbar muscles",
author = "Villafa{\~n}e, {Jorge H.} and Massimiliano Gobbo and Matteo Peranzoni and Ganesh Naik and Grace Imperio and Cleland, {Joshua A.} and Stefano Negrini",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3109/09638288.2015.1107777",
language = "English",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and everyday clinical applicability of lumbar muscle fatigue assessment methods in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Villafañe, Jorge H.

AU - Gobbo, Massimiliano

AU - Peranzoni, Matteo

AU - Naik, Ganesh

AU - Imperio, Grace

AU - Cleland, Joshua A.

AU - Negrini, Stefano

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - Purpose: This systematic literature review aimed at examining the validity and applicability in everyday clinical rehabilitation practise of methods for the assessment of back muscle fatiguability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP). Methods: Extensive research was performed in MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from their inception to September 2014. Potentially relevant articles were also manually looked for in the reference lists of the identified publications. Studies examining lumbar muscle fatigue in people with CNSLBP were selected. Two reviewers independently selected the articles, carried out the study quality assessment and extracted the results. A modified Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) scale was used to evaluate the scientific rigour of the selected works. Results: Twenty-four studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review. We found conflicting data regarding the validity of methods used to examine back muscle fatigue. The Biering-Sorensen test, performed in conjunction with surface electromyography spectral analysis, turned out to be the most widely used and comparatively, the most optimal modality currently available to assess objective back muscle fatigue in daily clinical practise, even though critical limitations are discussed. Conclusions: Future research should address the identification of an advanced method for lower back fatigue assessment in patients with CNSLBP which, eventually, might provide physical therapists with an objective and reliable test usable in everyday clinical practise.Implications for RehabilitationDespite its limitations, the Biering-Sorensen test is currently the most used, convenient and easily available fatiguing test for lumbar muscles.To increase validity and reliability of the Biering-Sorensen test, concomitant activation of synergistic muscles should be taken into account.Pooled mean frequency and half-width of the spectrum are currently the most valid electromyographic parameters to assess fatigue in chronic non-specific low back pain.Body mass index, grading of pain and level of disability of the study population should be reported to enhance research quality.

AB - Purpose: This systematic literature review aimed at examining the validity and applicability in everyday clinical rehabilitation practise of methods for the assessment of back muscle fatiguability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP). Methods: Extensive research was performed in MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from their inception to September 2014. Potentially relevant articles were also manually looked for in the reference lists of the identified publications. Studies examining lumbar muscle fatigue in people with CNSLBP were selected. Two reviewers independently selected the articles, carried out the study quality assessment and extracted the results. A modified Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) scale was used to evaluate the scientific rigour of the selected works. Results: Twenty-four studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the systematic review. We found conflicting data regarding the validity of methods used to examine back muscle fatigue. The Biering-Sorensen test, performed in conjunction with surface electromyography spectral analysis, turned out to be the most widely used and comparatively, the most optimal modality currently available to assess objective back muscle fatigue in daily clinical practise, even though critical limitations are discussed. Conclusions: Future research should address the identification of an advanced method for lower back fatigue assessment in patients with CNSLBP which, eventually, might provide physical therapists with an objective and reliable test usable in everyday clinical practise.Implications for RehabilitationDespite its limitations, the Biering-Sorensen test is currently the most used, convenient and easily available fatiguing test for lumbar muscles.To increase validity and reliability of the Biering-Sorensen test, concomitant activation of synergistic muscles should be taken into account.Pooled mean frequency and half-width of the spectrum are currently the most valid electromyographic parameters to assess fatigue in chronic non-specific low back pain.Body mass index, grading of pain and level of disability of the study population should be reported to enhance research quality.

KW - Electromyography

KW - fatigue

KW - low back pain

KW - lumbar muscles

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953262043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953262043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107777

DO - 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107777

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953262043

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

ER -