Validity of caregiver-reported hospital admission in a study on the quality of care received by terminally ill cancer patients

F. Chini, P. Giorgi Rossi, M. Costantini, M. Beccaro, P. Borgia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The clinical status of terminally ill patients often makes it impossible for them to report information directly, which indicates the need to rely on information from indirect sources, such as from caregivers. This information needs to be validated, and particular attention must be given to the accuracy of recall. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the agreement between caregiver-reported hospital admissions with the data reported in the regional hospital information system. Methods: A two-level probabilistic sample of cancer deaths from the ISDOC (Italian Survey on Dying of Cancer). For the 2,000 deceased sampled, hospitalizations were identified from the administrative data and reported by the caregivers via a questionnaire. We calculated Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity using the regional archives as the gold standard. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess possible variables that may influence agreement. Results: We interviewed 1,271 caregivers. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 82% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 79-84) and 65% (95% CI = 60-69). Kappa statistic was 0.46 (95% CI = 0.40-0.52). Multivariate analysis showed that agreement increases with educational level and caregiver age. Conclusion: The validation of caregiver's recall for medical procedures has important implications for research and care, because often it is the only information source we can rely on. The questionnaire showed good sensitivity and poor specificity concerning real hospitalizations, and had moderate degree of agreement with the data reported in the administrative data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-108
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Terminally Ill
Quality of Health Care
Caregivers
Neoplasms
Confidence Intervals
Sensitivity and Specificity
Hospitalization
Multivariate Analysis
Hospital Information Systems
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Accuracy of recall
  • Agreement
  • Caregiver reports
  • Medical records
  • Patient admissions
  • Terminal care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Validity of caregiver-reported hospital admission in a study on the quality of care received by terminally ill cancer patients. / Chini, F.; Rossi, P. Giorgi; Costantini, M.; Beccaro, M.; Borgia, P.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 63, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 103-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84ddc5ddad5c43bfb9a7fe38e297117b,
title = "Validity of caregiver-reported hospital admission in a study on the quality of care received by terminally ill cancer patients",
abstract = "Background: The clinical status of terminally ill patients often makes it impossible for them to report information directly, which indicates the need to rely on information from indirect sources, such as from caregivers. This information needs to be validated, and particular attention must be given to the accuracy of recall. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the agreement between caregiver-reported hospital admissions with the data reported in the regional hospital information system. Methods: A two-level probabilistic sample of cancer deaths from the ISDOC (Italian Survey on Dying of Cancer). For the 2,000 deceased sampled, hospitalizations were identified from the administrative data and reported by the caregivers via a questionnaire. We calculated Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity using the regional archives as the gold standard. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess possible variables that may influence agreement. Results: We interviewed 1,271 caregivers. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 82{\%} (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 79-84) and 65{\%} (95{\%} CI = 60-69). Kappa statistic was 0.46 (95{\%} CI = 0.40-0.52). Multivariate analysis showed that agreement increases with educational level and caregiver age. Conclusion: The validation of caregiver's recall for medical procedures has important implications for research and care, because often it is the only information source we can rely on. The questionnaire showed good sensitivity and poor specificity concerning real hospitalizations, and had moderate degree of agreement with the data reported in the administrative data.",
keywords = "Accuracy of recall, Agreement, Caregiver reports, Medical records, Patient admissions, Terminal care",
author = "F. Chini and Rossi, {P. Giorgi} and M. Costantini and M. Beccaro and P. Borgia",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.006",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "103--108",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of caregiver-reported hospital admission in a study on the quality of care received by terminally ill cancer patients

AU - Chini, F.

AU - Rossi, P. Giorgi

AU - Costantini, M.

AU - Beccaro, M.

AU - Borgia, P.

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Background: The clinical status of terminally ill patients often makes it impossible for them to report information directly, which indicates the need to rely on information from indirect sources, such as from caregivers. This information needs to be validated, and particular attention must be given to the accuracy of recall. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the agreement between caregiver-reported hospital admissions with the data reported in the regional hospital information system. Methods: A two-level probabilistic sample of cancer deaths from the ISDOC (Italian Survey on Dying of Cancer). For the 2,000 deceased sampled, hospitalizations were identified from the administrative data and reported by the caregivers via a questionnaire. We calculated Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity using the regional archives as the gold standard. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess possible variables that may influence agreement. Results: We interviewed 1,271 caregivers. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 82% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 79-84) and 65% (95% CI = 60-69). Kappa statistic was 0.46 (95% CI = 0.40-0.52). Multivariate analysis showed that agreement increases with educational level and caregiver age. Conclusion: The validation of caregiver's recall for medical procedures has important implications for research and care, because often it is the only information source we can rely on. The questionnaire showed good sensitivity and poor specificity concerning real hospitalizations, and had moderate degree of agreement with the data reported in the administrative data.

AB - Background: The clinical status of terminally ill patients often makes it impossible for them to report information directly, which indicates the need to rely on information from indirect sources, such as from caregivers. This information needs to be validated, and particular attention must be given to the accuracy of recall. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the agreement between caregiver-reported hospital admissions with the data reported in the regional hospital information system. Methods: A two-level probabilistic sample of cancer deaths from the ISDOC (Italian Survey on Dying of Cancer). For the 2,000 deceased sampled, hospitalizations were identified from the administrative data and reported by the caregivers via a questionnaire. We calculated Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity using the regional archives as the gold standard. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess possible variables that may influence agreement. Results: We interviewed 1,271 caregivers. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 82% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 79-84) and 65% (95% CI = 60-69). Kappa statistic was 0.46 (95% CI = 0.40-0.52). Multivariate analysis showed that agreement increases with educational level and caregiver age. Conclusion: The validation of caregiver's recall for medical procedures has important implications for research and care, because often it is the only information source we can rely on. The questionnaire showed good sensitivity and poor specificity concerning real hospitalizations, and had moderate degree of agreement with the data reported in the administrative data.

KW - Accuracy of recall

KW - Agreement

KW - Caregiver reports

KW - Medical records

KW - Patient admissions

KW - Terminal care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70849093339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70849093339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.02.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 19447582

AN - SCOPUS:70849093339

VL - 63

SP - 103

EP - 108

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 1

ER -