Value of navigator echo magnetic resonance angiography in detecting occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential coronary bypass gr afts

G. Molinari, F. Sardanelli, F. Zandrino, M. Balbi, M. A. Masperone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim of our work was to validate magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting occlusion/patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Twenty patients with previous history bypass surgery and recurrent episodes of chest pain were enrolled. Two patients could not be studied (claustrophobia, erratic breathing). Thus, 18 patients with 51 bypasses were examined using a navigator echo sequence: 21 arterial grafts (six sequential) and 30 saphenous vein grafts (five sequential). All patients had undergone contrast conventional angiography 3-15 days before MRA. The magnetic resonance (MR) data set was analyzed by two independent readers blinded to the results of conventional angiography (occlusion of 12 of 51 grafts). At magnetic resonance, two bypasses of the posterior descending artery, patent at conventional angiography, could not be visualized because of imaging slab malpositioning. Interobserver concordance was 96% (47/49). Magnetic resonance and conventional angiography provided identical answers in 47 out of 49 (96%) of the examined grafts. Eleven out of 12 occluded grafts and 36 out of 37 patent grafts were correctly identified with MR. As far as occlusion is concerned, the sensitivity of MR was 91%, the specificity 97%. To summarize, a 30 min outpatient MR examination is highly reliable in determining occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential bypasses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-160
Number of pages12
JournalThe International Journal of Cardiac Imaging
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Transplants
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Angiography
Phobic Disorders
Saphenous Vein
Chest Pain
Coronary Artery Bypass
Respiration
Outpatients
Arteries

Keywords

  • Angiography
  • Bypass
  • Coronary disease
  • Heart
  • Magnetic resonance (MR)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Value of navigator echo magnetic resonance angiography in detecting occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential coronary bypass gr afts. / Molinari, G.; Sardanelli, F.; Zandrino, F.; Balbi, M.; Masperone, M. A.

In: The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2000, p. 149-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4b81ed18ec23462281cb0429b98484d1,
title = "Value of navigator echo magnetic resonance angiography in detecting occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential coronary bypass gr afts",
abstract = "Aim of our work was to validate magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting occlusion/patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Twenty patients with previous history bypass surgery and recurrent episodes of chest pain were enrolled. Two patients could not be studied (claustrophobia, erratic breathing). Thus, 18 patients with 51 bypasses were examined using a navigator echo sequence: 21 arterial grafts (six sequential) and 30 saphenous vein grafts (five sequential). All patients had undergone contrast conventional angiography 3-15 days before MRA. The magnetic resonance (MR) data set was analyzed by two independent readers blinded to the results of conventional angiography (occlusion of 12 of 51 grafts). At magnetic resonance, two bypasses of the posterior descending artery, patent at conventional angiography, could not be visualized because of imaging slab malpositioning. Interobserver concordance was 96{\%} (47/49). Magnetic resonance and conventional angiography provided identical answers in 47 out of 49 (96{\%}) of the examined grafts. Eleven out of 12 occluded grafts and 36 out of 37 patent grafts were correctly identified with MR. As far as occlusion is concerned, the sensitivity of MR was 91{\%}, the specificity 97{\%}. To summarize, a 30 min outpatient MR examination is highly reliable in determining occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential bypasses.",
keywords = "Angiography, Bypass, Coronary disease, Heart, Magnetic resonance (MR)",
author = "G. Molinari and F. Sardanelli and F. Zandrino and M. Balbi and Masperone, {M. A.}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1023/A:1006432027712",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "149--160",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging",
issn = "1569-5794",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Value of navigator echo magnetic resonance angiography in detecting occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential coronary bypass gr afts

AU - Molinari, G.

AU - Sardanelli, F.

AU - Zandrino, F.

AU - Balbi, M.

AU - Masperone, M. A.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Aim of our work was to validate magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting occlusion/patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Twenty patients with previous history bypass surgery and recurrent episodes of chest pain were enrolled. Two patients could not be studied (claustrophobia, erratic breathing). Thus, 18 patients with 51 bypasses were examined using a navigator echo sequence: 21 arterial grafts (six sequential) and 30 saphenous vein grafts (five sequential). All patients had undergone contrast conventional angiography 3-15 days before MRA. The magnetic resonance (MR) data set was analyzed by two independent readers blinded to the results of conventional angiography (occlusion of 12 of 51 grafts). At magnetic resonance, two bypasses of the posterior descending artery, patent at conventional angiography, could not be visualized because of imaging slab malpositioning. Interobserver concordance was 96% (47/49). Magnetic resonance and conventional angiography provided identical answers in 47 out of 49 (96%) of the examined grafts. Eleven out of 12 occluded grafts and 36 out of 37 patent grafts were correctly identified with MR. As far as occlusion is concerned, the sensitivity of MR was 91%, the specificity 97%. To summarize, a 30 min outpatient MR examination is highly reliable in determining occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential bypasses.

AB - Aim of our work was to validate magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detecting occlusion/patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Twenty patients with previous history bypass surgery and recurrent episodes of chest pain were enrolled. Two patients could not be studied (claustrophobia, erratic breathing). Thus, 18 patients with 51 bypasses were examined using a navigator echo sequence: 21 arterial grafts (six sequential) and 30 saphenous vein grafts (five sequential). All patients had undergone contrast conventional angiography 3-15 days before MRA. The magnetic resonance (MR) data set was analyzed by two independent readers blinded to the results of conventional angiography (occlusion of 12 of 51 grafts). At magnetic resonance, two bypasses of the posterior descending artery, patent at conventional angiography, could not be visualized because of imaging slab malpositioning. Interobserver concordance was 96% (47/49). Magnetic resonance and conventional angiography provided identical answers in 47 out of 49 (96%) of the examined grafts. Eleven out of 12 occluded grafts and 36 out of 37 patent grafts were correctly identified with MR. As far as occlusion is concerned, the sensitivity of MR was 91%, the specificity 97%. To summarize, a 30 min outpatient MR examination is highly reliable in determining occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential bypasses.

KW - Angiography

KW - Bypass

KW - Coronary disease

KW - Heart

KW - Magnetic resonance (MR)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033646137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033646137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1006432027712

DO - 10.1023/A:1006432027712

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 149

EP - 160

JO - International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

JF - International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

SN - 1569-5794

IS - 3

ER -