Variability and predictors of response to continuous theta burst stimulation

A TMS-EEG study

Lorenzo Rocchi, Jaime Ibáñez, Alberto Benussi, Ricci Hannah, Vishal Rawji, Elias Casula, John Rothwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm reported to decrease the excitability of the stimulated cortical area and which is thought to reflect a form of inhibitory synaptic plasticity. However, since its introduction, the effect of cTBS has shown a remarkable variability in its effects, which are often quantified by measuring the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Part of this inconsistency in experimental results might be due to an intrinsic variability of TMS effects caused by genetic or neurophysiologic factors. However, it is also possible that MEP only reflect the excitability of a sub-population of output neurons; resting EEG power and measures combining TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) might represent a more thorough reflection of cortical excitability. The aim of the present study was to verify the robustness of several predictors of cTBS response, such as I wave recruitment and baseline MEP amplitude, and to test cTBS after-effects on multiple neurophysiologic measurements such as MEP, resting EEG power, local mean field power (LMFP), TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP), and inter-trial phase clustering (ITPC). As a result, we were not able to confirm either the expected decrease of MEP amplitude after cTBS or the ability of I wave recruitment and MEP amplitude to predict the response to cTBS. Resting EEG power, LMFP, TRSP, and ITPC showed a more consistent trend toward a decrease after cTBS. Overall, our data suggest that the effect of cTBS on corticospinal excitability is variable and difficult to predict with common electrophysiologic markers, while its effect might be clearer when probed with combined TMS and EEG.

Original languageEnglish
Article number400
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Volume12
Issue numberJUN
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 12 2018

Fingerprint

Motor Evoked Potentials
Electroencephalography
Cluster Analysis
Neuronal Plasticity
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Neurons
Population

Keywords

  • Electroencephalography (EEG)
  • Motor evoked potentials (MEPs)
  • Plasticity
  • Theta-burst stimulation
  • Time-frequency analysis
  • TMS-EEG
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Variability and predictors of response to continuous theta burst stimulation : A TMS-EEG study. / Rocchi, Lorenzo; Ibáñez, Jaime; Benussi, Alberto; Hannah, Ricci; Rawji, Vishal; Casula, Elias; Rothwell, John.

In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 12, No. JUN, 400, 12.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rocchi, Lorenzo ; Ibáñez, Jaime ; Benussi, Alberto ; Hannah, Ricci ; Rawji, Vishal ; Casula, Elias ; Rothwell, John. / Variability and predictors of response to continuous theta burst stimulation : A TMS-EEG study. In: Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2018 ; Vol. 12, No. JUN.
@article{2d36076a062344ee96c5a4d1ce7e04be,
title = "Variability and predictors of response to continuous theta burst stimulation: A TMS-EEG study",
abstract = "Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm reported to decrease the excitability of the stimulated cortical area and which is thought to reflect a form of inhibitory synaptic plasticity. However, since its introduction, the effect of cTBS has shown a remarkable variability in its effects, which are often quantified by measuring the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Part of this inconsistency in experimental results might be due to an intrinsic variability of TMS effects caused by genetic or neurophysiologic factors. However, it is also possible that MEP only reflect the excitability of a sub-population of output neurons; resting EEG power and measures combining TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) might represent a more thorough reflection of cortical excitability. The aim of the present study was to verify the robustness of several predictors of cTBS response, such as I wave recruitment and baseline MEP amplitude, and to test cTBS after-effects on multiple neurophysiologic measurements such as MEP, resting EEG power, local mean field power (LMFP), TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP), and inter-trial phase clustering (ITPC). As a result, we were not able to confirm either the expected decrease of MEP amplitude after cTBS or the ability of I wave recruitment and MEP amplitude to predict the response to cTBS. Resting EEG power, LMFP, TRSP, and ITPC showed a more consistent trend toward a decrease after cTBS. Overall, our data suggest that the effect of cTBS on corticospinal excitability is variable and difficult to predict with common electrophysiologic markers, while its effect might be clearer when probed with combined TMS and EEG.",
keywords = "Electroencephalography (EEG), Motor evoked potentials (MEPs), Plasticity, Theta-burst stimulation, Time-frequency analysis, TMS-EEG, Transcranial magnetic stimulation",
author = "Lorenzo Rocchi and Jaime Ib{\'a}{\~n}ez and Alberto Benussi and Ricci Hannah and Vishal Rawji and Elias Casula and John Rothwell",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "12",
doi = "10.3389/fnins.2018.00400",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Frontiers in Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-4548",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",
number = "JUN",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability and predictors of response to continuous theta burst stimulation

T2 - A TMS-EEG study

AU - Rocchi, Lorenzo

AU - Ibáñez, Jaime

AU - Benussi, Alberto

AU - Hannah, Ricci

AU - Rawji, Vishal

AU - Casula, Elias

AU - Rothwell, John

PY - 2018/6/12

Y1 - 2018/6/12

N2 - Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm reported to decrease the excitability of the stimulated cortical area and which is thought to reflect a form of inhibitory synaptic plasticity. However, since its introduction, the effect of cTBS has shown a remarkable variability in its effects, which are often quantified by measuring the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Part of this inconsistency in experimental results might be due to an intrinsic variability of TMS effects caused by genetic or neurophysiologic factors. However, it is also possible that MEP only reflect the excitability of a sub-population of output neurons; resting EEG power and measures combining TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) might represent a more thorough reflection of cortical excitability. The aim of the present study was to verify the robustness of several predictors of cTBS response, such as I wave recruitment and baseline MEP amplitude, and to test cTBS after-effects on multiple neurophysiologic measurements such as MEP, resting EEG power, local mean field power (LMFP), TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP), and inter-trial phase clustering (ITPC). As a result, we were not able to confirm either the expected decrease of MEP amplitude after cTBS or the ability of I wave recruitment and MEP amplitude to predict the response to cTBS. Resting EEG power, LMFP, TRSP, and ITPC showed a more consistent trend toward a decrease after cTBS. Overall, our data suggest that the effect of cTBS on corticospinal excitability is variable and difficult to predict with common electrophysiologic markers, while its effect might be clearer when probed with combined TMS and EEG.

AB - Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm reported to decrease the excitability of the stimulated cortical area and which is thought to reflect a form of inhibitory synaptic plasticity. However, since its introduction, the effect of cTBS has shown a remarkable variability in its effects, which are often quantified by measuring the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Part of this inconsistency in experimental results might be due to an intrinsic variability of TMS effects caused by genetic or neurophysiologic factors. However, it is also possible that MEP only reflect the excitability of a sub-population of output neurons; resting EEG power and measures combining TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) might represent a more thorough reflection of cortical excitability. The aim of the present study was to verify the robustness of several predictors of cTBS response, such as I wave recruitment and baseline MEP amplitude, and to test cTBS after-effects on multiple neurophysiologic measurements such as MEP, resting EEG power, local mean field power (LMFP), TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP), and inter-trial phase clustering (ITPC). As a result, we were not able to confirm either the expected decrease of MEP amplitude after cTBS or the ability of I wave recruitment and MEP amplitude to predict the response to cTBS. Resting EEG power, LMFP, TRSP, and ITPC showed a more consistent trend toward a decrease after cTBS. Overall, our data suggest that the effect of cTBS on corticospinal excitability is variable and difficult to predict with common electrophysiologic markers, while its effect might be clearer when probed with combined TMS and EEG.

KW - Electroencephalography (EEG)

KW - Motor evoked potentials (MEPs)

KW - Plasticity

KW - Theta-burst stimulation

KW - Time-frequency analysis

KW - TMS-EEG

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048617573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048617573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2018.00400

DO - 10.3389/fnins.2018.00400

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience

SN - 1662-4548

IS - JUN

M1 - 400

ER -