Ventricular activity cancellation in electrograms during atrial fibrillation with constraints on residuals' power

Valentina D A Corino, Massimo W. Rivolta, Roberto Sassi, Federico Lombardi, Luca T. Mainardi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During atrial fibrillation (AF), cancellation of ventricular activity from atrial electrograms (AEG) is commonly performed by template matching and subtraction (TMS): a running template, built in correspondence of QRSs, is subtracted from the AEG to uncover atrial activity (AA). However, TMS can produce poor cancellation, leaving high-power residues. In this study, we propose to modulate the templates before subtraction, in order to make the residuals as similar as possible to the nearby atrial activity, avoiding high-power ones. The coefficients used to modulate the template are estimated by maximizing, via Multi-swarm Particle Swarm Optimization, a fitness function. The modulated TMS method (mTMS) was tested on synthetic and real AEGs. Cancellation performances were assessed using: normalized mean squared error (NMSE, computed on simulated data only), reduction of ventricular activity (VDR), and percentage of segments (PP) whose power was outside the standard range of the atrial power. All testings suggested that mTMS is an improvement over TMS alone, being, on simulated data, NMSE and PP significantly decreased while VDR significantly increased. Similar results were obtained on real electrograms (median values of CS1 recordings PP: 2.44 vs. 0.38 p<0.001; VDR: 6.71 vs. 8.15 p<0.001).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1770-1777
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Engineering and Physics
Volume35
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Cardiac Electrophysiologic Techniques
Template matching
Atrial Fibrillation
Particle swarm optimization (PSO)
Testing

Keywords

  • Atrial electrograms
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Multi-swarm Particle Swarm Optimization
  • Ventricular interference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Biophysics

Cite this

Ventricular activity cancellation in electrograms during atrial fibrillation with constraints on residuals' power. / Corino, Valentina D A; Rivolta, Massimo W.; Sassi, Roberto; Lombardi, Federico; Mainardi, Luca T.

In: Medical Engineering and Physics, Vol. 35, No. 12, 12.2013, p. 1770-1777.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Corino, Valentina D A ; Rivolta, Massimo W. ; Sassi, Roberto ; Lombardi, Federico ; Mainardi, Luca T. / Ventricular activity cancellation in electrograms during atrial fibrillation with constraints on residuals' power. In: Medical Engineering and Physics. 2013 ; Vol. 35, No. 12. pp. 1770-1777.
@article{6aa351e12d704038917d3dc0bfdf5a81,
title = "Ventricular activity cancellation in electrograms during atrial fibrillation with constraints on residuals' power",
abstract = "During atrial fibrillation (AF), cancellation of ventricular activity from atrial electrograms (AEG) is commonly performed by template matching and subtraction (TMS): a running template, built in correspondence of QRSs, is subtracted from the AEG to uncover atrial activity (AA). However, TMS can produce poor cancellation, leaving high-power residues. In this study, we propose to modulate the templates before subtraction, in order to make the residuals as similar as possible to the nearby atrial activity, avoiding high-power ones. The coefficients used to modulate the template are estimated by maximizing, via Multi-swarm Particle Swarm Optimization, a fitness function. The modulated TMS method (mTMS) was tested on synthetic and real AEGs. Cancellation performances were assessed using: normalized mean squared error (NMSE, computed on simulated data only), reduction of ventricular activity (VDR), and percentage of segments (PP) whose power was outside the standard range of the atrial power. All testings suggested that mTMS is an improvement over TMS alone, being, on simulated data, NMSE and PP significantly decreased while VDR significantly increased. Similar results were obtained on real electrograms (median values of CS1 recordings PP: 2.44 vs. 0.38 p<0.001; VDR: 6.71 vs. 8.15 p<0.001).",
keywords = "Atrial electrograms, Atrial fibrillation, Multi-swarm Particle Swarm Optimization, Ventricular interference",
author = "Corino, {Valentina D A} and Rivolta, {Massimo W.} and Roberto Sassi and Federico Lombardi and Mainardi, {Luca T.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.07.010",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1770--1777",
journal = "Medical Engineering and Physics",
issn = "1350-4533",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ventricular activity cancellation in electrograms during atrial fibrillation with constraints on residuals' power

AU - Corino, Valentina D A

AU - Rivolta, Massimo W.

AU - Sassi, Roberto

AU - Lombardi, Federico

AU - Mainardi, Luca T.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - During atrial fibrillation (AF), cancellation of ventricular activity from atrial electrograms (AEG) is commonly performed by template matching and subtraction (TMS): a running template, built in correspondence of QRSs, is subtracted from the AEG to uncover atrial activity (AA). However, TMS can produce poor cancellation, leaving high-power residues. In this study, we propose to modulate the templates before subtraction, in order to make the residuals as similar as possible to the nearby atrial activity, avoiding high-power ones. The coefficients used to modulate the template are estimated by maximizing, via Multi-swarm Particle Swarm Optimization, a fitness function. The modulated TMS method (mTMS) was tested on synthetic and real AEGs. Cancellation performances were assessed using: normalized mean squared error (NMSE, computed on simulated data only), reduction of ventricular activity (VDR), and percentage of segments (PP) whose power was outside the standard range of the atrial power. All testings suggested that mTMS is an improvement over TMS alone, being, on simulated data, NMSE and PP significantly decreased while VDR significantly increased. Similar results were obtained on real electrograms (median values of CS1 recordings PP: 2.44 vs. 0.38 p<0.001; VDR: 6.71 vs. 8.15 p<0.001).

AB - During atrial fibrillation (AF), cancellation of ventricular activity from atrial electrograms (AEG) is commonly performed by template matching and subtraction (TMS): a running template, built in correspondence of QRSs, is subtracted from the AEG to uncover atrial activity (AA). However, TMS can produce poor cancellation, leaving high-power residues. In this study, we propose to modulate the templates before subtraction, in order to make the residuals as similar as possible to the nearby atrial activity, avoiding high-power ones. The coefficients used to modulate the template are estimated by maximizing, via Multi-swarm Particle Swarm Optimization, a fitness function. The modulated TMS method (mTMS) was tested on synthetic and real AEGs. Cancellation performances were assessed using: normalized mean squared error (NMSE, computed on simulated data only), reduction of ventricular activity (VDR), and percentage of segments (PP) whose power was outside the standard range of the atrial power. All testings suggested that mTMS is an improvement over TMS alone, being, on simulated data, NMSE and PP significantly decreased while VDR significantly increased. Similar results were obtained on real electrograms (median values of CS1 recordings PP: 2.44 vs. 0.38 p<0.001; VDR: 6.71 vs. 8.15 p<0.001).

KW - Atrial electrograms

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Multi-swarm Particle Swarm Optimization

KW - Ventricular interference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889601736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889601736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.07.010

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1770

EP - 1777

JO - Medical Engineering and Physics

JF - Medical Engineering and Physics

SN - 1350-4533

IS - 12

ER -