Visual Scanning Training, Limb Activation Treatment, and prism adaptation for rehabilitating left neglect: Who is the winner?

Konstantinos Priftis, Laura Passarini, Cristina Pilosio, Francesca Meneghello, Marco Pitteri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared, for the first time, the overall and differential effects of three of the most widely used left neglect (LN) treatments: Visual Scanning Training (VST), Limb Activation Treatment (LAT), and Prism Adaptation (PA). Thirty-three LN patients were assigned in quasi-random order to the three groups (VST, LAT, or PA). Each patient received only one type of treatment. LN patients' performance on everyday life tasks was assessed four times (over a period of six weeks): A1 and A2 (i.e., the two pre-treatment assessments); A3 and A4 (i.e., the two post-treatment assessments). LN patients in each of the three treatment conditions were treated for the same number of sessions (i.e., 20). The results showed that improvements were present in the majority of the tests assessing the peripersonal space in everyday life activities. Our findings were independent of unspecific factors and lasted for at least two weeks following the end of the treatments. There were no interactions, however, between LN treatments and assessments. We suggest that all three treatments can be considered as valid rehabilitation interventions for LN and could be employed for ameliorating LN signs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Issue numberJUN
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 22 2013

Fingerprint

Extremities
Therapeutics
varespladib methyl
Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Limb Activation Treatment
  • Neglect
  • Prism adaptation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Stroke
  • Visual Scanning Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neurology
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Visual Scanning Training, Limb Activation Treatment, and prism adaptation for rehabilitating left neglect : Who is the winner? / Priftis, Konstantinos; Passarini, Laura; Pilosio, Cristina; Meneghello, Francesca; Pitteri, Marco.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, No. JUN, 22.06.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{720ac8e5e5204921a4009fa21620c5c8,
title = "Visual Scanning Training, Limb Activation Treatment, and prism adaptation for rehabilitating left neglect: Who is the winner?",
abstract = "We compared, for the first time, the overall and differential effects of three of the most widely used left neglect (LN) treatments: Visual Scanning Training (VST), Limb Activation Treatment (LAT), and Prism Adaptation (PA). Thirty-three LN patients were assigned in quasi-random order to the three groups (VST, LAT, or PA). Each patient received only one type of treatment. LN patients' performance on everyday life tasks was assessed four times (over a period of six weeks): A1 and A2 (i.e., the two pre-treatment assessments); A3 and A4 (i.e., the two post-treatment assessments). LN patients in each of the three treatment conditions were treated for the same number of sessions (i.e., 20). The results showed that improvements were present in the majority of the tests assessing the peripersonal space in everyday life activities. Our findings were independent of unspecific factors and lasted for at least two weeks following the end of the treatments. There were no interactions, however, between LN treatments and assessments. We suggest that all three treatments can be considered as valid rehabilitation interventions for LN and could be employed for ameliorating LN signs.",
keywords = "Limb Activation Treatment, Neglect, Prism adaptation, Rehabilitation, Stroke, Visual Scanning Training",
author = "Konstantinos Priftis and Laura Passarini and Cristina Pilosio and Francesca Meneghello and Marco Pitteri",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "22",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2013.00360",
language = "English",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "JUN",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual Scanning Training, Limb Activation Treatment, and prism adaptation for rehabilitating left neglect

T2 - Who is the winner?

AU - Priftis, Konstantinos

AU - Passarini, Laura

AU - Pilosio, Cristina

AU - Meneghello, Francesca

AU - Pitteri, Marco

PY - 2013/6/22

Y1 - 2013/6/22

N2 - We compared, for the first time, the overall and differential effects of three of the most widely used left neglect (LN) treatments: Visual Scanning Training (VST), Limb Activation Treatment (LAT), and Prism Adaptation (PA). Thirty-three LN patients were assigned in quasi-random order to the three groups (VST, LAT, or PA). Each patient received only one type of treatment. LN patients' performance on everyday life tasks was assessed four times (over a period of six weeks): A1 and A2 (i.e., the two pre-treatment assessments); A3 and A4 (i.e., the two post-treatment assessments). LN patients in each of the three treatment conditions were treated for the same number of sessions (i.e., 20). The results showed that improvements were present in the majority of the tests assessing the peripersonal space in everyday life activities. Our findings were independent of unspecific factors and lasted for at least two weeks following the end of the treatments. There were no interactions, however, between LN treatments and assessments. We suggest that all three treatments can be considered as valid rehabilitation interventions for LN and could be employed for ameliorating LN signs.

AB - We compared, for the first time, the overall and differential effects of three of the most widely used left neglect (LN) treatments: Visual Scanning Training (VST), Limb Activation Treatment (LAT), and Prism Adaptation (PA). Thirty-three LN patients were assigned in quasi-random order to the three groups (VST, LAT, or PA). Each patient received only one type of treatment. LN patients' performance on everyday life tasks was assessed four times (over a period of six weeks): A1 and A2 (i.e., the two pre-treatment assessments); A3 and A4 (i.e., the two post-treatment assessments). LN patients in each of the three treatment conditions were treated for the same number of sessions (i.e., 20). The results showed that improvements were present in the majority of the tests assessing the peripersonal space in everyday life activities. Our findings were independent of unspecific factors and lasted for at least two weeks following the end of the treatments. There were no interactions, however, between LN treatments and assessments. We suggest that all three treatments can be considered as valid rehabilitation interventions for LN and could be employed for ameliorating LN signs.

KW - Limb Activation Treatment

KW - Neglect

KW - Prism adaptation

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Stroke

KW - Visual Scanning Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933675857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933675857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00360

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00360

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84933675857

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

IS - JUN

ER -