Visual Versus semi-quantitative analysis of 18F-FDG-PET in Amnestic MCI

An European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) project

Silvia Morbelli, Andrea Brugnolo, Irene Bossert, Ambra Buschiazzo, Giovanni B. Frisoni, Samantha Galluzzi, Bart N M Van Berckel, Rik Ossenkoppele, Robert Perneczky, Alexander Drzezga, Mira Didic, Eric Guedj, Gianmario Sambuceti, Gianluca Bottoni, Dario Arnaldi, Agnese Picco, Fabrizio De Carli, Marco Pagani, Flavio Nobili

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the accuracy of FDG-PET to detect the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain glucose hypometabolic pattern in 142 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and 109 healthy controls. aMCI patients were followed for at least two years or until conversion to dementia. Images were evaluated by means of visual read by either moderately-skilled or expert readers, and by means of a summary metric of AD-like hypometabolism (PALZ score). Seventy-seven patients converted to AD-dementia after 28.6 ± 19.3 months of follow-up. Expert reading was the most accurate tool to detect these MCI converters from healthy controls (sensitivity 89.6%, specificity 89.0%, accuracy 89.2%) while two moderately-skilled readers were less (p <0.05) specific (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 79.8%, accuracy 82.3%) and PALZ score was less (p <0.001) sensitive (sensitivity 62.3%, specificity 91.7%, accuracy 79.6%). Among the remaining 67 aMCI patients, 50 were confirmed as aMCI after an average of 42.3 months, 12 developed other dementia, and 3 reverted to normalcy. In 30/50 persistent MCI patients, the expert recognized the AD hypometabolic pattern. In 13/50 aMCI, both the expert and PALZ score were negative while in 7/50, only the PALZ score was positive due to sparse hypometabolic clusters mainly in frontal lobes. Visual FDG-PET reads by an expert is the most accurate method but an automated, validated system may be particularly helpful to moderately-skilled readers because of high specificity, and should be mandatory when even a moderately-skilled reader is unavailable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)815-826
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Alzheimer Disease
Sensitivity and Specificity
Dementia
Frontal Lobe
Reading
Cognitive Dysfunction
Glucose
Brain

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • amnestic mild cognitive impairment
  • FDG-PET
  • PALZ score
  • visual read

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Visual Versus semi-quantitative analysis of 18F-FDG-PET in Amnestic MCI : An European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) project. / Morbelli, Silvia; Brugnolo, Andrea; Bossert, Irene; Buschiazzo, Ambra; Frisoni, Giovanni B.; Galluzzi, Samantha; Van Berckel, Bart N M; Ossenkoppele, Rik; Perneczky, Robert; Drzezga, Alexander; Didic, Mira; Guedj, Eric; Sambuceti, Gianmario; Bottoni, Gianluca; Arnaldi, Dario; Picco, Agnese; De Carli, Fabrizio; Pagani, Marco; Nobili, Flavio.

In: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2015, p. 815-826.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morbelli, S, Brugnolo, A, Bossert, I, Buschiazzo, A, Frisoni, GB, Galluzzi, S, Van Berckel, BNM, Ossenkoppele, R, Perneczky, R, Drzezga, A, Didic, M, Guedj, E, Sambuceti, G, Bottoni, G, Arnaldi, D, Picco, A, De Carli, F, Pagani, M & Nobili, F 2015, 'Visual Versus semi-quantitative analysis of 18F-FDG-PET in Amnestic MCI: An European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) project', Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 815-826. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-142229
Morbelli, Silvia ; Brugnolo, Andrea ; Bossert, Irene ; Buschiazzo, Ambra ; Frisoni, Giovanni B. ; Galluzzi, Samantha ; Van Berckel, Bart N M ; Ossenkoppele, Rik ; Perneczky, Robert ; Drzezga, Alexander ; Didic, Mira ; Guedj, Eric ; Sambuceti, Gianmario ; Bottoni, Gianluca ; Arnaldi, Dario ; Picco, Agnese ; De Carli, Fabrizio ; Pagani, Marco ; Nobili, Flavio. / Visual Versus semi-quantitative analysis of 18F-FDG-PET in Amnestic MCI : An European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) project. In: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 2015 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 815-826.
@article{db0b8541a4e6496687dbf78a2099c3a4,
title = "Visual Versus semi-quantitative analysis of 18F-FDG-PET in Amnestic MCI: An European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) project",
abstract = "We aimed to investigate the accuracy of FDG-PET to detect the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain glucose hypometabolic pattern in 142 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and 109 healthy controls. aMCI patients were followed for at least two years or until conversion to dementia. Images were evaluated by means of visual read by either moderately-skilled or expert readers, and by means of a summary metric of AD-like hypometabolism (PALZ score). Seventy-seven patients converted to AD-dementia after 28.6 ± 19.3 months of follow-up. Expert reading was the most accurate tool to detect these MCI converters from healthy controls (sensitivity 89.6{\%}, specificity 89.0{\%}, accuracy 89.2{\%}) while two moderately-skilled readers were less (p <0.05) specific (sensitivity 85.7{\%}, specificity 79.8{\%}, accuracy 82.3{\%}) and PALZ score was less (p <0.001) sensitive (sensitivity 62.3{\%}, specificity 91.7{\%}, accuracy 79.6{\%}). Among the remaining 67 aMCI patients, 50 were confirmed as aMCI after an average of 42.3 months, 12 developed other dementia, and 3 reverted to normalcy. In 30/50 persistent MCI patients, the expert recognized the AD hypometabolic pattern. In 13/50 aMCI, both the expert and PALZ score were negative while in 7/50, only the PALZ score was positive due to sparse hypometabolic clusters mainly in frontal lobes. Visual FDG-PET reads by an expert is the most accurate method but an automated, validated system may be particularly helpful to moderately-skilled readers because of high specificity, and should be mandatory when even a moderately-skilled reader is unavailable.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, FDG-PET, PALZ score, visual read",
author = "Silvia Morbelli and Andrea Brugnolo and Irene Bossert and Ambra Buschiazzo and Frisoni, {Giovanni B.} and Samantha Galluzzi and {Van Berckel}, {Bart N M} and Rik Ossenkoppele and Robert Perneczky and Alexander Drzezga and Mira Didic and Eric Guedj and Gianmario Sambuceti and Gianluca Bottoni and Dario Arnaldi and Agnese Picco and {De Carli}, Fabrizio and Marco Pagani and Flavio Nobili",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3233/JAD-142229",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "815--826",
journal = "Journal of Alzheimer's Disease",
issn = "1387-2877",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual Versus semi-quantitative analysis of 18F-FDG-PET in Amnestic MCI

T2 - An European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) project

AU - Morbelli, Silvia

AU - Brugnolo, Andrea

AU - Bossert, Irene

AU - Buschiazzo, Ambra

AU - Frisoni, Giovanni B.

AU - Galluzzi, Samantha

AU - Van Berckel, Bart N M

AU - Ossenkoppele, Rik

AU - Perneczky, Robert

AU - Drzezga, Alexander

AU - Didic, Mira

AU - Guedj, Eric

AU - Sambuceti, Gianmario

AU - Bottoni, Gianluca

AU - Arnaldi, Dario

AU - Picco, Agnese

AU - De Carli, Fabrizio

AU - Pagani, Marco

AU - Nobili, Flavio

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We aimed to investigate the accuracy of FDG-PET to detect the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain glucose hypometabolic pattern in 142 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and 109 healthy controls. aMCI patients were followed for at least two years or until conversion to dementia. Images were evaluated by means of visual read by either moderately-skilled or expert readers, and by means of a summary metric of AD-like hypometabolism (PALZ score). Seventy-seven patients converted to AD-dementia after 28.6 ± 19.3 months of follow-up. Expert reading was the most accurate tool to detect these MCI converters from healthy controls (sensitivity 89.6%, specificity 89.0%, accuracy 89.2%) while two moderately-skilled readers were less (p <0.05) specific (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 79.8%, accuracy 82.3%) and PALZ score was less (p <0.001) sensitive (sensitivity 62.3%, specificity 91.7%, accuracy 79.6%). Among the remaining 67 aMCI patients, 50 were confirmed as aMCI after an average of 42.3 months, 12 developed other dementia, and 3 reverted to normalcy. In 30/50 persistent MCI patients, the expert recognized the AD hypometabolic pattern. In 13/50 aMCI, both the expert and PALZ score were negative while in 7/50, only the PALZ score was positive due to sparse hypometabolic clusters mainly in frontal lobes. Visual FDG-PET reads by an expert is the most accurate method but an automated, validated system may be particularly helpful to moderately-skilled readers because of high specificity, and should be mandatory when even a moderately-skilled reader is unavailable.

AB - We aimed to investigate the accuracy of FDG-PET to detect the Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain glucose hypometabolic pattern in 142 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and 109 healthy controls. aMCI patients were followed for at least two years or until conversion to dementia. Images were evaluated by means of visual read by either moderately-skilled or expert readers, and by means of a summary metric of AD-like hypometabolism (PALZ score). Seventy-seven patients converted to AD-dementia after 28.6 ± 19.3 months of follow-up. Expert reading was the most accurate tool to detect these MCI converters from healthy controls (sensitivity 89.6%, specificity 89.0%, accuracy 89.2%) while two moderately-skilled readers were less (p <0.05) specific (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 79.8%, accuracy 82.3%) and PALZ score was less (p <0.001) sensitive (sensitivity 62.3%, specificity 91.7%, accuracy 79.6%). Among the remaining 67 aMCI patients, 50 were confirmed as aMCI after an average of 42.3 months, 12 developed other dementia, and 3 reverted to normalcy. In 30/50 persistent MCI patients, the expert recognized the AD hypometabolic pattern. In 13/50 aMCI, both the expert and PALZ score were negative while in 7/50, only the PALZ score was positive due to sparse hypometabolic clusters mainly in frontal lobes. Visual FDG-PET reads by an expert is the most accurate method but an automated, validated system may be particularly helpful to moderately-skilled readers because of high specificity, and should be mandatory when even a moderately-skilled reader is unavailable.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - amnestic mild cognitive impairment

KW - FDG-PET

KW - PALZ score

KW - visual read

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922617690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922617690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/JAD-142229

DO - 10.3233/JAD-142229

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 815

EP - 826

JO - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

JF - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

SN - 1387-2877

IS - 3

ER -