What are judgment skills in health literacy? A psycho-cognitive perspective of judgment and decision-making research

Silvia Riva, Alessandro Antonietti, Paola Iannello, Gabriella Pravettoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this review is to summarize current research relating to psychological processes involved in judgment and decision-making (JDM) and identify which processes can be incorporated and used in the construct of health literacy (HL) in order to enrich its conceptualization and to provide more information about people’s preferences. Methods: The literature review was aimed at identifying comprehensive research in the field; therefore appropriate databases were searched for English language articles dated from 1998 to 2015. Results: Several psychological processes have been found to be constituents of JDM and potentially incorporated in the definition of HL: cognition, self-regulation, emotion, reasoning-thinking, and social perception. Conclusion: HL research can benefit from this JDM literature overview, first, by elaborating on the idea that judgment is multidimensional and constituted by several specific processes, and second, by using the results to implement the definition of “judgment skills”. Moreover, this review can favor the development of new instruments that can measure HL. Practical implications: Future researchers in HL should work together with researchers in psychological sciences not only to investigate the processes behind JDM in-depth but also to create effective opportunities to improve HL in all patients, to promote good decisions, and orient patients’ preferences in all health contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1677-1686
Number of pages10
JournalPatient Preference and Adherence
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 23 2015

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Decision Making
literacy
decision making
health
Research
Psychology
Research Personnel
Social Perception
Patient Preference
social cognition
Cognition
self-regulation
Emotions
Language
English language
cognition
Databases
emotion
Health

Keywords

  • Cognitive factors
  • Decision-making
  • Health literacy
  • Judgment
  • Psychological processes
  • Skills

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)

Cite this

What are judgment skills in health literacy? A psycho-cognitive perspective of judgment and decision-making research. / Riva, Silvia; Antonietti, Alessandro; Iannello, Paola; Pravettoni, Gabriella.

In: Patient Preference and Adherence, Vol. 9, 23.11.2015, p. 1677-1686.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{460b3b1a36d242db845aa0a11ece1213,
title = "What are judgment skills in health literacy? A psycho-cognitive perspective of judgment and decision-making research",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of this review is to summarize current research relating to psychological processes involved in judgment and decision-making (JDM) and identify which processes can be incorporated and used in the construct of health literacy (HL) in order to enrich its conceptualization and to provide more information about people’s preferences. Methods: The literature review was aimed at identifying comprehensive research in the field; therefore appropriate databases were searched for English language articles dated from 1998 to 2015. Results: Several psychological processes have been found to be constituents of JDM and potentially incorporated in the definition of HL: cognition, self-regulation, emotion, reasoning-thinking, and social perception. Conclusion: HL research can benefit from this JDM literature overview, first, by elaborating on the idea that judgment is multidimensional and constituted by several specific processes, and second, by using the results to implement the definition of “judgment skills”. Moreover, this review can favor the development of new instruments that can measure HL. Practical implications: Future researchers in HL should work together with researchers in psychological sciences not only to investigate the processes behind JDM in-depth but also to create effective opportunities to improve HL in all patients, to promote good decisions, and orient patients’ preferences in all health contexts.",
keywords = "Cognitive factors, Decision-making, Health literacy, Judgment, Psychological processes, Skills",
author = "Silvia Riva and Alessandro Antonietti and Paola Iannello and Gabriella Pravettoni",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "23",
doi = "10.2147/PPA.S90207",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1677--1686",
journal = "Patient Preference and Adherence",
issn = "1177-889X",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What are judgment skills in health literacy? A psycho-cognitive perspective of judgment and decision-making research

AU - Riva, Silvia

AU - Antonietti, Alessandro

AU - Iannello, Paola

AU - Pravettoni, Gabriella

PY - 2015/11/23

Y1 - 2015/11/23

N2 - Objective: The aim of this review is to summarize current research relating to psychological processes involved in judgment and decision-making (JDM) and identify which processes can be incorporated and used in the construct of health literacy (HL) in order to enrich its conceptualization and to provide more information about people’s preferences. Methods: The literature review was aimed at identifying comprehensive research in the field; therefore appropriate databases were searched for English language articles dated from 1998 to 2015. Results: Several psychological processes have been found to be constituents of JDM and potentially incorporated in the definition of HL: cognition, self-regulation, emotion, reasoning-thinking, and social perception. Conclusion: HL research can benefit from this JDM literature overview, first, by elaborating on the idea that judgment is multidimensional and constituted by several specific processes, and second, by using the results to implement the definition of “judgment skills”. Moreover, this review can favor the development of new instruments that can measure HL. Practical implications: Future researchers in HL should work together with researchers in psychological sciences not only to investigate the processes behind JDM in-depth but also to create effective opportunities to improve HL in all patients, to promote good decisions, and orient patients’ preferences in all health contexts.

AB - Objective: The aim of this review is to summarize current research relating to psychological processes involved in judgment and decision-making (JDM) and identify which processes can be incorporated and used in the construct of health literacy (HL) in order to enrich its conceptualization and to provide more information about people’s preferences. Methods: The literature review was aimed at identifying comprehensive research in the field; therefore appropriate databases were searched for English language articles dated from 1998 to 2015. Results: Several psychological processes have been found to be constituents of JDM and potentially incorporated in the definition of HL: cognition, self-regulation, emotion, reasoning-thinking, and social perception. Conclusion: HL research can benefit from this JDM literature overview, first, by elaborating on the idea that judgment is multidimensional and constituted by several specific processes, and second, by using the results to implement the definition of “judgment skills”. Moreover, this review can favor the development of new instruments that can measure HL. Practical implications: Future researchers in HL should work together with researchers in psychological sciences not only to investigate the processes behind JDM in-depth but also to create effective opportunities to improve HL in all patients, to promote good decisions, and orient patients’ preferences in all health contexts.

KW - Cognitive factors

KW - Decision-making

KW - Health literacy

KW - Judgment

KW - Psychological processes

KW - Skills

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948756527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948756527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/PPA.S90207

DO - 10.2147/PPA.S90207

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84948756527

VL - 9

SP - 1677

EP - 1686

JO - Patient Preference and Adherence

JF - Patient Preference and Adherence

SN - 1177-889X

ER -