What criteria do consumer health librarians use to develop library collections? A phenomenological study

Janet Papadakos, Aileen Trang, David Wiljer, Chiara Cipolat Mis, Alaina Cyr, Audrey Jusko Friedman, Mauro Mazzocut, Michelle Snow, Valeria Raivich, Pamela Catton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The criteria for determining whether resources are included in consumer health library collections are summarized in institutional collection development policies (CDPs). Evidence suggests that CDPs do not adequately capture all of these criteria. The aim of this study was to describe the resource review experience of librarians and compare it to what is described in CDPs. Methods: A phenomenological approach was used to explore and describe the process. Four consumer health librarians independently evaluated cancerrelated consumer health resources and described their review process during a semi-structured telephone interview. Afterward, these librarians completed online questionnaires about their approaches to collection development. CDPs from participating libraries, interview transcripts, and questionnaire data were analyzed. Researchers summarized the findings, and participating librarians reviewed results for validation. Results: Librarians all utilized similar criteria, as documented in their CDPs; however, of thirteen criteria described in the study, only four were documented in CDPs. Conclusions: CDPs for consumer health libraries may be missing important criteria that are considered integral parts of the collection development process. Implications: A better understanding of the criteria and contextual factors involved in the collection development process can assist with establishing high-quality consumer health library collections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-84
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Medical Library Association
Volume102
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Librarians
Policy Making
Libraries
development policy
librarian
Health
health
resources
Interviews
questionnaire
Health Resources
telephone interview
Health Policy
Research Personnel
interview

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Health Informatics
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

What criteria do consumer health librarians use to develop library collections? A phenomenological study. / Papadakos, Janet; Trang, Aileen; Wiljer, David; Mis, Chiara Cipolat; Cyr, Alaina; Friedman, Audrey Jusko; Mazzocut, Mauro; Snow, Michelle; Raivich, Valeria; Catton, Pamela.

In: Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 102, No. 2, 2014, p. 78-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Papadakos, J, Trang, A, Wiljer, D, Mis, CC, Cyr, A, Friedman, AJ, Mazzocut, M, Snow, M, Raivich, V & Catton, P 2014, 'What criteria do consumer health librarians use to develop library collections? A phenomenological study', Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 78-84. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.003
Papadakos, Janet ; Trang, Aileen ; Wiljer, David ; Mis, Chiara Cipolat ; Cyr, Alaina ; Friedman, Audrey Jusko ; Mazzocut, Mauro ; Snow, Michelle ; Raivich, Valeria ; Catton, Pamela. / What criteria do consumer health librarians use to develop library collections? A phenomenological study. In: Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2014 ; Vol. 102, No. 2. pp. 78-84.
@article{1bf65a72c72a455ca7154ec7995a613d,
title = "What criteria do consumer health librarians use to develop library collections? A phenomenological study",
abstract = "Objectives: The criteria for determining whether resources are included in consumer health library collections are summarized in institutional collection development policies (CDPs). Evidence suggests that CDPs do not adequately capture all of these criteria. The aim of this study was to describe the resource review experience of librarians and compare it to what is described in CDPs. Methods: A phenomenological approach was used to explore and describe the process. Four consumer health librarians independently evaluated cancerrelated consumer health resources and described their review process during a semi-structured telephone interview. Afterward, these librarians completed online questionnaires about their approaches to collection development. CDPs from participating libraries, interview transcripts, and questionnaire data were analyzed. Researchers summarized the findings, and participating librarians reviewed results for validation. Results: Librarians all utilized similar criteria, as documented in their CDPs; however, of thirteen criteria described in the study, only four were documented in CDPs. Conclusions: CDPs for consumer health libraries may be missing important criteria that are considered integral parts of the collection development process. Implications: A better understanding of the criteria and contextual factors involved in the collection development process can assist with establishing high-quality consumer health library collections.",
author = "Janet Papadakos and Aileen Trang and David Wiljer and Mis, {Chiara Cipolat} and Alaina Cyr and Friedman, {Audrey Jusko} and Mauro Mazzocut and Michelle Snow and Valeria Raivich and Pamela Catton",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.003",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "78--84",
journal = "Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA",
issn = "1536-5050",
publisher = "Medical Library Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What criteria do consumer health librarians use to develop library collections? A phenomenological study

AU - Papadakos, Janet

AU - Trang, Aileen

AU - Wiljer, David

AU - Mis, Chiara Cipolat

AU - Cyr, Alaina

AU - Friedman, Audrey Jusko

AU - Mazzocut, Mauro

AU - Snow, Michelle

AU - Raivich, Valeria

AU - Catton, Pamela

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: The criteria for determining whether resources are included in consumer health library collections are summarized in institutional collection development policies (CDPs). Evidence suggests that CDPs do not adequately capture all of these criteria. The aim of this study was to describe the resource review experience of librarians and compare it to what is described in CDPs. Methods: A phenomenological approach was used to explore and describe the process. Four consumer health librarians independently evaluated cancerrelated consumer health resources and described their review process during a semi-structured telephone interview. Afterward, these librarians completed online questionnaires about their approaches to collection development. CDPs from participating libraries, interview transcripts, and questionnaire data were analyzed. Researchers summarized the findings, and participating librarians reviewed results for validation. Results: Librarians all utilized similar criteria, as documented in their CDPs; however, of thirteen criteria described in the study, only four were documented in CDPs. Conclusions: CDPs for consumer health libraries may be missing important criteria that are considered integral parts of the collection development process. Implications: A better understanding of the criteria and contextual factors involved in the collection development process can assist with establishing high-quality consumer health library collections.

AB - Objectives: The criteria for determining whether resources are included in consumer health library collections are summarized in institutional collection development policies (CDPs). Evidence suggests that CDPs do not adequately capture all of these criteria. The aim of this study was to describe the resource review experience of librarians and compare it to what is described in CDPs. Methods: A phenomenological approach was used to explore and describe the process. Four consumer health librarians independently evaluated cancerrelated consumer health resources and described their review process during a semi-structured telephone interview. Afterward, these librarians completed online questionnaires about their approaches to collection development. CDPs from participating libraries, interview transcripts, and questionnaire data were analyzed. Researchers summarized the findings, and participating librarians reviewed results for validation. Results: Librarians all utilized similar criteria, as documented in their CDPs; however, of thirteen criteria described in the study, only four were documented in CDPs. Conclusions: CDPs for consumer health libraries may be missing important criteria that are considered integral parts of the collection development process. Implications: A better understanding of the criteria and contextual factors involved in the collection development process can assist with establishing high-quality consumer health library collections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901450293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901450293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.003

DO - 10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.003

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 78

EP - 84

JO - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

JF - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

SN - 1536-5050

IS - 2

ER -