What defines airflow obstruction in asthma?

I. Cerveri, A. G. Corsico, S. Accordini, G. Cervio, E. Ansaldo, A. Grosso, R. Niniano, E. Tsana Tegomo, J. M. Antó, N. Künzli, C. Janson, J. Sunyer, C. Svanes, J. Heinrich, J. P. Schouten, M. Wjst, E. Pozzi, R. De Marco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Asthma guidelines from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute provide conflicting definitions of airflow obstruction, suggesting a fixed forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) cut-off point and the lower limit of normality (LLN), respectively. The LLN was recommended by the recent American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines on lung function testing. The problem in using fixed cut-off points is that they are set regardless of age and sex in an attempt to simplify diagnosis at the expense of misclassification. The sensitivity and specificity of fixed FEV1/FVC ratios of 0.70, 0.75 and 0.80 versus the LLN were evaluated in 815 subjects (aged 20-44 yrs) with a diagnosis of asthma within the framework of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. In males, the 0.70 ratio showed 76.5% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity, the 0.75 ratio 100.0% sensitivity and 92.4% specificity, and the 0.80 ratio 100.0% sensitivity but 58.1% specificity. In females, the 0.70 ratio showed 57.3% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity, the 0.75 ratio 91.5% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity, and the 0.80 ratio 100.0% sensitivity but 72.9% specificity. The fixed cut-off points cause a lot of misidentification of airflow obstruction in young adults, with overestimation with the 0.80 ratio and underestimation with the 0.70 ratio. In conclusion, the GINA guidelines should change their criteria for defining airflow obstruction. Copyright

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)568-573
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Asthma
Sensitivity and Specificity
Vital Capacity
Forced Expiratory Volume
Guidelines
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)
European Union
Health Surveys
Young Adult
Lung

Keywords

  • Airflow obstruction
  • Asthma
  • Diagnosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Cerveri, I., Corsico, A. G., Accordini, S., Cervio, G., Ansaldo, E., Grosso, A., ... De Marco, R. (2009). What defines airflow obstruction in asthma? European Respiratory Journal, 34(3), 568-573. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00172908

What defines airflow obstruction in asthma? / Cerveri, I.; Corsico, A. G.; Accordini, S.; Cervio, G.; Ansaldo, E.; Grosso, A.; Niniano, R.; Tegomo, E. Tsana; Antó, J. M.; Künzli, N.; Janson, C.; Sunyer, J.; Svanes, C.; Heinrich, J.; Schouten, J. P.; Wjst, M.; Pozzi, E.; De Marco, R.

In: European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 568-573.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cerveri, I, Corsico, AG, Accordini, S, Cervio, G, Ansaldo, E, Grosso, A, Niniano, R, Tegomo, ET, Antó, JM, Künzli, N, Janson, C, Sunyer, J, Svanes, C, Heinrich, J, Schouten, JP, Wjst, M, Pozzi, E & De Marco, R 2009, 'What defines airflow obstruction in asthma?', European Respiratory Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 568-573. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00172908
Cerveri, I. ; Corsico, A. G. ; Accordini, S. ; Cervio, G. ; Ansaldo, E. ; Grosso, A. ; Niniano, R. ; Tegomo, E. Tsana ; Antó, J. M. ; Künzli, N. ; Janson, C. ; Sunyer, J. ; Svanes, C. ; Heinrich, J. ; Schouten, J. P. ; Wjst, M. ; Pozzi, E. ; De Marco, R. / What defines airflow obstruction in asthma?. In: European Respiratory Journal. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 568-573.
@article{53ea247df4244c7ba14a35137624f5e2,
title = "What defines airflow obstruction in asthma?",
abstract = "Asthma guidelines from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute provide conflicting definitions of airflow obstruction, suggesting a fixed forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) cut-off point and the lower limit of normality (LLN), respectively. The LLN was recommended by the recent American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines on lung function testing. The problem in using fixed cut-off points is that they are set regardless of age and sex in an attempt to simplify diagnosis at the expense of misclassification. The sensitivity and specificity of fixed FEV1/FVC ratios of 0.70, 0.75 and 0.80 versus the LLN were evaluated in 815 subjects (aged 20-44 yrs) with a diagnosis of asthma within the framework of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. In males, the 0.70 ratio showed 76.5{\%} sensitivity and 100.0{\%} specificity, the 0.75 ratio 100.0{\%} sensitivity and 92.4{\%} specificity, and the 0.80 ratio 100.0{\%} sensitivity but 58.1{\%} specificity. In females, the 0.70 ratio showed 57.3{\%} sensitivity and 100.0{\%} specificity, the 0.75 ratio 91.5{\%} sensitivity and 95.9{\%} specificity, and the 0.80 ratio 100.0{\%} sensitivity but 72.9{\%} specificity. The fixed cut-off points cause a lot of misidentification of airflow obstruction in young adults, with overestimation with the 0.80 ratio and underestimation with the 0.70 ratio. In conclusion, the GINA guidelines should change their criteria for defining airflow obstruction. Copyright",
keywords = "Airflow obstruction, Asthma, Diagnosis",
author = "I. Cerveri and Corsico, {A. G.} and S. Accordini and G. Cervio and E. Ansaldo and A. Grosso and R. Niniano and Tegomo, {E. Tsana} and Ant{\'o}, {J. M.} and N. K{\"u}nzli and C. Janson and J. Sunyer and C. Svanes and J. Heinrich and Schouten, {J. P.} and M. Wjst and E. Pozzi and {De Marco}, R.",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1183/09031936.00172908",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "568--573",
journal = "European Journal of Respiratory Diseases",
issn = "0903-1936",
publisher = "European Respiratory Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What defines airflow obstruction in asthma?

AU - Cerveri, I.

AU - Corsico, A. G.

AU - Accordini, S.

AU - Cervio, G.

AU - Ansaldo, E.

AU - Grosso, A.

AU - Niniano, R.

AU - Tegomo, E. Tsana

AU - Antó, J. M.

AU - Künzli, N.

AU - Janson, C.

AU - Sunyer, J.

AU - Svanes, C.

AU - Heinrich, J.

AU - Schouten, J. P.

AU - Wjst, M.

AU - Pozzi, E.

AU - De Marco, R.

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Asthma guidelines from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute provide conflicting definitions of airflow obstruction, suggesting a fixed forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) cut-off point and the lower limit of normality (LLN), respectively. The LLN was recommended by the recent American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines on lung function testing. The problem in using fixed cut-off points is that they are set regardless of age and sex in an attempt to simplify diagnosis at the expense of misclassification. The sensitivity and specificity of fixed FEV1/FVC ratios of 0.70, 0.75 and 0.80 versus the LLN were evaluated in 815 subjects (aged 20-44 yrs) with a diagnosis of asthma within the framework of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. In males, the 0.70 ratio showed 76.5% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity, the 0.75 ratio 100.0% sensitivity and 92.4% specificity, and the 0.80 ratio 100.0% sensitivity but 58.1% specificity. In females, the 0.70 ratio showed 57.3% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity, the 0.75 ratio 91.5% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity, and the 0.80 ratio 100.0% sensitivity but 72.9% specificity. The fixed cut-off points cause a lot of misidentification of airflow obstruction in young adults, with overestimation with the 0.80 ratio and underestimation with the 0.70 ratio. In conclusion, the GINA guidelines should change their criteria for defining airflow obstruction. Copyright

AB - Asthma guidelines from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute provide conflicting definitions of airflow obstruction, suggesting a fixed forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) cut-off point and the lower limit of normality (LLN), respectively. The LLN was recommended by the recent American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines on lung function testing. The problem in using fixed cut-off points is that they are set regardless of age and sex in an attempt to simplify diagnosis at the expense of misclassification. The sensitivity and specificity of fixed FEV1/FVC ratios of 0.70, 0.75 and 0.80 versus the LLN were evaluated in 815 subjects (aged 20-44 yrs) with a diagnosis of asthma within the framework of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. In males, the 0.70 ratio showed 76.5% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity, the 0.75 ratio 100.0% sensitivity and 92.4% specificity, and the 0.80 ratio 100.0% sensitivity but 58.1% specificity. In females, the 0.70 ratio showed 57.3% sensitivity and 100.0% specificity, the 0.75 ratio 91.5% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity, and the 0.80 ratio 100.0% sensitivity but 72.9% specificity. The fixed cut-off points cause a lot of misidentification of airflow obstruction in young adults, with overestimation with the 0.80 ratio and underestimation with the 0.70 ratio. In conclusion, the GINA guidelines should change their criteria for defining airflow obstruction. Copyright

KW - Airflow obstruction

KW - Asthma

KW - Diagnosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349161069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349161069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1183/09031936.00172908

DO - 10.1183/09031936.00172908

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 568

EP - 573

JO - European Journal of Respiratory Diseases

JF - European Journal of Respiratory Diseases

SN - 0903-1936

IS - 3

ER -