What is a "good" result after transcatheter mitral repair? Impact of 2+ residual mitral regurgitation

Nicola Buzzatti, Michele De Bonis, Paolo Denti, Fabio Barili, Davide Schiavi, Giovanna Di Giannuario, Giovanni La Canna, Ottavio Alfieri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective The study objective was to assess the impact on follow-up outcomes of residual mitral regurgitation 2+ in comparison with ≤1+ after MitraClip (Abbott Vascular Inc, Santa Clara, Calif) repair. Methods We compared the outcomes of mitral regurgitation 2+ and mitral regurgitation ≤1+ groups among a population of 223 consecutive patients with acute residual mitral regurgitation ≤2+ who underwent MitraClip implantation at San Raffaele Scientific Institute (Milan, Italy) between October 2008 and December 2014. Results Residual mitral regurgitation 2+ was found in 64 patients (28.7%). Overall actuarial survival was 63.1% ± 4.4% at 48 months. Cumulative incidence functions of cardiac death in patients with mitral regurgitation 2+ was significantly higher (Gray test P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-95
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume151
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2016

Keywords

  • MitraClip
  • mitral regurgitation
  • repair
  • transcatheter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What is a "good" result after transcatheter mitral repair? Impact of 2+ residual mitral regurgitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this