Which cardiac surgical patients can benefit from placement of a pulmonary artery catheter?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) during cardiac surgery varies considerably depending on local policy, ranging from use in 5-10% of the patient population to routine application. However, as in other clinical fields, recent years have witnessed a progressive decline in PAC use. One of the reasons for this is probably the increasing use of transoesophageal echocardiograpy, even though careful analysis of the information provided by PAC and transoesophageal echocardiograpy indicates that the two tools should be considered subsidiary rather than alternatives. The principal categories of cardiac patients who can benefit from PAC monitoring are those with present and those with possible haemodynamic instability. On this basis we can identify five groups: patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function; those with impaired right ventricular systolic function; those with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction; those with an acute ventricular septal defect; and those with a left ventricular assist device. This review highlights the specific role of PAC-derived haemodynamic data for each category.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberS6
JournalCritical Care
Volume10
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 27 2006

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Artery
Catheters
Hemodynamics
Right Ventricular Function
Heart-Assist Devices
Ventricular Heart Septal Defects
Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Left Ventricular Function
Thoracic Surgery
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Which cardiac surgical patients can benefit from placement of a pulmonary artery catheter? / Ranucci, Marco.

In: Critical Care, Vol. 10, No. SUPPL. 3, S6, 27.11.2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f94116fef454496d92288dad9bdf7db1,
title = "Which cardiac surgical patients can benefit from placement of a pulmonary artery catheter?",
abstract = "The use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) during cardiac surgery varies considerably depending on local policy, ranging from use in 5-10{\%} of the patient population to routine application. However, as in other clinical fields, recent years have witnessed a progressive decline in PAC use. One of the reasons for this is probably the increasing use of transoesophageal echocardiograpy, even though careful analysis of the information provided by PAC and transoesophageal echocardiograpy indicates that the two tools should be considered subsidiary rather than alternatives. The principal categories of cardiac patients who can benefit from PAC monitoring are those with present and those with possible haemodynamic instability. On this basis we can identify five groups: patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function; those with impaired right ventricular systolic function; those with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction; those with an acute ventricular septal defect; and those with a left ventricular assist device. This review highlights the specific role of PAC-derived haemodynamic data for each category.",
author = "Marco Ranucci",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1186/cc4833",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Critical Care",
issn = "1466-609X",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "SUPPL. 3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which cardiac surgical patients can benefit from placement of a pulmonary artery catheter?

AU - Ranucci, Marco

PY - 2006/11/27

Y1 - 2006/11/27

N2 - The use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) during cardiac surgery varies considerably depending on local policy, ranging from use in 5-10% of the patient population to routine application. However, as in other clinical fields, recent years have witnessed a progressive decline in PAC use. One of the reasons for this is probably the increasing use of transoesophageal echocardiograpy, even though careful analysis of the information provided by PAC and transoesophageal echocardiograpy indicates that the two tools should be considered subsidiary rather than alternatives. The principal categories of cardiac patients who can benefit from PAC monitoring are those with present and those with possible haemodynamic instability. On this basis we can identify five groups: patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function; those with impaired right ventricular systolic function; those with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction; those with an acute ventricular septal defect; and those with a left ventricular assist device. This review highlights the specific role of PAC-derived haemodynamic data for each category.

AB - The use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) during cardiac surgery varies considerably depending on local policy, ranging from use in 5-10% of the patient population to routine application. However, as in other clinical fields, recent years have witnessed a progressive decline in PAC use. One of the reasons for this is probably the increasing use of transoesophageal echocardiograpy, even though careful analysis of the information provided by PAC and transoesophageal echocardiograpy indicates that the two tools should be considered subsidiary rather than alternatives. The principal categories of cardiac patients who can benefit from PAC monitoring are those with present and those with possible haemodynamic instability. On this basis we can identify five groups: patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function; those with impaired right ventricular systolic function; those with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction; those with an acute ventricular septal defect; and those with a left ventricular assist device. This review highlights the specific role of PAC-derived haemodynamic data for each category.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548342692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548342692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/cc4833

DO - 10.1186/cc4833

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Critical Care

JF - Critical Care

SN - 1466-609X

IS - SUPPL. 3

M1 - S6

ER -