Why do patients with partial epilepsy improve their IQ after training to self-regulate slow cortical potentials?

Ute Strehl, Boris Kotchoubey, Simone Martinetz, Niels Birbaumer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In patients with epilepsy, not only seizures but also cognitive, emotional, and social functioning are of increasing interest in research (Kelley, Jacobs, & Lowenstein, 2009). As a decrease in cognitive functions over the course of the illness is usually reported, we wanted to explore changes in Intelligence Scores observed after a neurofeedback treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. In a controlled study that compared the outcome of three different interventions (training to regulate slow cortical potentials, N = 34; training to regulate breath rate and the amount of carbon dioxide in the end tidal volume of the exhaled air, N = 11; modification of drug regime, N = 25), pre- and postmeasurements of a short version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale were applied. The interval between the two assessments was more than 12 months, with a mean of 61 weeks. Mean age of the patients was 35, with a range from 17 to 57. The highly significant 7-point increment of IQ only after training of slow cortical potentials was not related to clinical (e.g., seizure reduction) or neuropsychological (e.g., attention and memory) variables. Instead, it was related to psychophysiological measures: IQ change was inversely related to the Latency of the P300 component of event-related brain potentials and directly related to the Latency of the P2 component and the increase of N2 Amplitude during training. We conclude that regulation training of slow cortical potentials improves IQ in patients with refractory partial epilepsy, which might be related to an improved ability for controlled allocation of cognitive resources.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-213
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Neurotherapy
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Partial Epilepsy
Intelligence
Seizures
Neurofeedback
P300 Event-Related Potentials
Wechsler Scales
Aptitude
Resource Allocation
Tidal Volume
Evoked Potentials
Carbon Dioxide
Cognition
Epilepsy
Air
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Brain
Research
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Why do patients with partial epilepsy improve their IQ after training to self-regulate slow cortical potentials? / Strehl, Ute; Kotchoubey, Boris; Martinetz, Simone; Birbaumer, Niels.

In: Journal of Neurotherapy, Vol. 15, No. 3, 07.2011, p. 200-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Strehl, Ute ; Kotchoubey, Boris ; Martinetz, Simone ; Birbaumer, Niels. / Why do patients with partial epilepsy improve their IQ after training to self-regulate slow cortical potentials?. In: Journal of Neurotherapy. 2011 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 200-213.
@article{15930d4f53c54fcda28a8302ea70de8f,
title = "Why do patients with partial epilepsy improve their IQ after training to self-regulate slow cortical potentials?",
abstract = "In patients with epilepsy, not only seizures but also cognitive, emotional, and social functioning are of increasing interest in research (Kelley, Jacobs, & Lowenstein, 2009). As a decrease in cognitive functions over the course of the illness is usually reported, we wanted to explore changes in Intelligence Scores observed after a neurofeedback treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. In a controlled study that compared the outcome of three different interventions (training to regulate slow cortical potentials, N = 34; training to regulate breath rate and the amount of carbon dioxide in the end tidal volume of the exhaled air, N = 11; modification of drug regime, N = 25), pre- and postmeasurements of a short version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale were applied. The interval between the two assessments was more than 12 months, with a mean of 61 weeks. Mean age of the patients was 35, with a range from 17 to 57. The highly significant 7-point increment of IQ only after training of slow cortical potentials was not related to clinical (e.g., seizure reduction) or neuropsychological (e.g., attention and memory) variables. Instead, it was related to psychophysiological measures: IQ change was inversely related to the Latency of the P300 component of event-related brain potentials and directly related to the Latency of the P2 component and the increase of N2 Amplitude during training. We conclude that regulation training of slow cortical potentials improves IQ in patients with refractory partial epilepsy, which might be related to an improved ability for controlled allocation of cognitive resources.",
author = "Ute Strehl and Boris Kotchoubey and Simone Martinetz and Niels Birbaumer",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/10874208.2011.597249",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "200--213",
journal = "Journal of Neurotherapy",
issn = "1087-4208",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do patients with partial epilepsy improve their IQ after training to self-regulate slow cortical potentials?

AU - Strehl, Ute

AU - Kotchoubey, Boris

AU - Martinetz, Simone

AU - Birbaumer, Niels

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - In patients with epilepsy, not only seizures but also cognitive, emotional, and social functioning are of increasing interest in research (Kelley, Jacobs, & Lowenstein, 2009). As a decrease in cognitive functions over the course of the illness is usually reported, we wanted to explore changes in Intelligence Scores observed after a neurofeedback treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. In a controlled study that compared the outcome of three different interventions (training to regulate slow cortical potentials, N = 34; training to regulate breath rate and the amount of carbon dioxide in the end tidal volume of the exhaled air, N = 11; modification of drug regime, N = 25), pre- and postmeasurements of a short version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale were applied. The interval between the two assessments was more than 12 months, with a mean of 61 weeks. Mean age of the patients was 35, with a range from 17 to 57. The highly significant 7-point increment of IQ only after training of slow cortical potentials was not related to clinical (e.g., seizure reduction) or neuropsychological (e.g., attention and memory) variables. Instead, it was related to psychophysiological measures: IQ change was inversely related to the Latency of the P300 component of event-related brain potentials and directly related to the Latency of the P2 component and the increase of N2 Amplitude during training. We conclude that regulation training of slow cortical potentials improves IQ in patients with refractory partial epilepsy, which might be related to an improved ability for controlled allocation of cognitive resources.

AB - In patients with epilepsy, not only seizures but also cognitive, emotional, and social functioning are of increasing interest in research (Kelley, Jacobs, & Lowenstein, 2009). As a decrease in cognitive functions over the course of the illness is usually reported, we wanted to explore changes in Intelligence Scores observed after a neurofeedback treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. In a controlled study that compared the outcome of three different interventions (training to regulate slow cortical potentials, N = 34; training to regulate breath rate and the amount of carbon dioxide in the end tidal volume of the exhaled air, N = 11; modification of drug regime, N = 25), pre- and postmeasurements of a short version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale were applied. The interval between the two assessments was more than 12 months, with a mean of 61 weeks. Mean age of the patients was 35, with a range from 17 to 57. The highly significant 7-point increment of IQ only after training of slow cortical potentials was not related to clinical (e.g., seizure reduction) or neuropsychological (e.g., attention and memory) variables. Instead, it was related to psychophysiological measures: IQ change was inversely related to the Latency of the P300 component of event-related brain potentials and directly related to the Latency of the P2 component and the increase of N2 Amplitude during training. We conclude that regulation training of slow cortical potentials improves IQ in patients with refractory partial epilepsy, which might be related to an improved ability for controlled allocation of cognitive resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052203494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052203494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10874208.2011.597249

DO - 10.1080/10874208.2011.597249

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 200

EP - 213

JO - Journal of Neurotherapy

JF - Journal of Neurotherapy

SN - 1087-4208

IS - 3

ER -