Wireless pH monitoring: Better tolerability and lower impact on daily habits

A. Grigolon, I. Bravi, P. Cantù, D. Conte, R. Penagini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Twenty-four hours oesophageal pH monitoring is considered the reference-standard for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but it is limited by catheter discomfort and limitations of daily habits. Aim: We evaluated tolerability and impact on food intake and daily activities of catheter-based compared to wireless pH monitoring. Patients: One-hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients with suspected gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were enrolled. Methods: Seventy-eight patients (36 M, 53 ± 2 years) underwent the 24 h catheter-based and 55 patients (25 M, 44 ± 3 years) the 48 h wireless pH monitoring. Discomfort at placement and during the test was evaluated by 100 mm visual analogue scales. Limitations of food intake and of daily activities were evaluated by standardized questionnaires (score 0 to 3). Results: Discomfort (mean ± standard error of the mean) at placement and during the test was 32 ± 3 versus 29 ± 4 (p = ns) and 37 ± 3 versus 22 ± 3 (p <0.001) for the catheter-based versus wireless techniques. Limitation of food intake and of daily activities (mean ± standard error of the mean) were 0.9 ± 0.1 versus 0.4 ± 0.1 (p <0.05) and 1.2 ± 0.1 versus 0.2 ± 0.1 (p <0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: The wireless pH monitoring is better tolerated and has minor impact on daily habits compared to the traditional technique. Whether this translates into better diagnostic accuracy remains to be evaluated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)720-724
Number of pages5
JournalDigestive and Liver Disease
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Habits
Catheters
Esophageal Diseases
Eating
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Esophageal pH Monitoring
Visual Analog Scale

Keywords

  • Daily
  • Food
  • Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
  • Wireless pH monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Wireless pH monitoring : Better tolerability and lower impact on daily habits. / Grigolon, A.; Bravi, I.; Cantù, P.; Conte, D.; Penagini, R.

In: Digestive and Liver Disease, Vol. 39, No. 8, 08.2007, p. 720-724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2966feaf884a4527a0c337a5d511a829,
title = "Wireless pH monitoring: Better tolerability and lower impact on daily habits",
abstract = "Background: Twenty-four hours oesophageal pH monitoring is considered the reference-standard for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but it is limited by catheter discomfort and limitations of daily habits. Aim: We evaluated tolerability and impact on food intake and daily activities of catheter-based compared to wireless pH monitoring. Patients: One-hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients with suspected gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were enrolled. Methods: Seventy-eight patients (36 M, 53 ± 2 years) underwent the 24 h catheter-based and 55 patients (25 M, 44 ± 3 years) the 48 h wireless pH monitoring. Discomfort at placement and during the test was evaluated by 100 mm visual analogue scales. Limitations of food intake and of daily activities were evaluated by standardized questionnaires (score 0 to 3). Results: Discomfort (mean ± standard error of the mean) at placement and during the test was 32 ± 3 versus 29 ± 4 (p = ns) and 37 ± 3 versus 22 ± 3 (p <0.001) for the catheter-based versus wireless techniques. Limitation of food intake and of daily activities (mean ± standard error of the mean) were 0.9 ± 0.1 versus 0.4 ± 0.1 (p <0.05) and 1.2 ± 0.1 versus 0.2 ± 0.1 (p <0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: The wireless pH monitoring is better tolerated and has minor impact on daily habits compared to the traditional technique. Whether this translates into better diagnostic accuracy remains to be evaluated.",
keywords = "Daily, Food, Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, Wireless pH monitoring",
author = "A. Grigolon and I. Bravi and P. Cant{\`u} and D. Conte and R. Penagini",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.dld.2007.05.011",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "720--724",
journal = "Digestive and Liver Disease",
issn = "1590-8658",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wireless pH monitoring

T2 - Better tolerability and lower impact on daily habits

AU - Grigolon, A.

AU - Bravi, I.

AU - Cantù, P.

AU - Conte, D.

AU - Penagini, R.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Background: Twenty-four hours oesophageal pH monitoring is considered the reference-standard for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but it is limited by catheter discomfort and limitations of daily habits. Aim: We evaluated tolerability and impact on food intake and daily activities of catheter-based compared to wireless pH monitoring. Patients: One-hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients with suspected gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were enrolled. Methods: Seventy-eight patients (36 M, 53 ± 2 years) underwent the 24 h catheter-based and 55 patients (25 M, 44 ± 3 years) the 48 h wireless pH monitoring. Discomfort at placement and during the test was evaluated by 100 mm visual analogue scales. Limitations of food intake and of daily activities were evaluated by standardized questionnaires (score 0 to 3). Results: Discomfort (mean ± standard error of the mean) at placement and during the test was 32 ± 3 versus 29 ± 4 (p = ns) and 37 ± 3 versus 22 ± 3 (p <0.001) for the catheter-based versus wireless techniques. Limitation of food intake and of daily activities (mean ± standard error of the mean) were 0.9 ± 0.1 versus 0.4 ± 0.1 (p <0.05) and 1.2 ± 0.1 versus 0.2 ± 0.1 (p <0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: The wireless pH monitoring is better tolerated and has minor impact on daily habits compared to the traditional technique. Whether this translates into better diagnostic accuracy remains to be evaluated.

AB - Background: Twenty-four hours oesophageal pH monitoring is considered the reference-standard for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, but it is limited by catheter discomfort and limitations of daily habits. Aim: We evaluated tolerability and impact on food intake and daily activities of catheter-based compared to wireless pH monitoring. Patients: One-hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients with suspected gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were enrolled. Methods: Seventy-eight patients (36 M, 53 ± 2 years) underwent the 24 h catheter-based and 55 patients (25 M, 44 ± 3 years) the 48 h wireless pH monitoring. Discomfort at placement and during the test was evaluated by 100 mm visual analogue scales. Limitations of food intake and of daily activities were evaluated by standardized questionnaires (score 0 to 3). Results: Discomfort (mean ± standard error of the mean) at placement and during the test was 32 ± 3 versus 29 ± 4 (p = ns) and 37 ± 3 versus 22 ± 3 (p <0.001) for the catheter-based versus wireless techniques. Limitation of food intake and of daily activities (mean ± standard error of the mean) were 0.9 ± 0.1 versus 0.4 ± 0.1 (p <0.05) and 1.2 ± 0.1 versus 0.2 ± 0.1 (p <0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: The wireless pH monitoring is better tolerated and has minor impact on daily habits compared to the traditional technique. Whether this translates into better diagnostic accuracy remains to be evaluated.

KW - Daily

KW - Food

KW - Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

KW - Wireless pH monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447294849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447294849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2007.05.011

DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2007.05.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 17602906

AN - SCOPUS:34447294849

VL - 39

SP - 720

EP - 724

JO - Digestive and Liver Disease

JF - Digestive and Liver Disease

SN - 1590-8658

IS - 8

ER -