Women outperform men in remembering to remember

Liana Palermo, Maria Cristina Cinelli, Laura Piccardi, Paola Ciurli, Chiara Incoccia, Laura Zompanti, Cecilia Guariglia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The study of gender differences in prospective memory (i.e., remembering to remember) has received modest attention in the literature. The few reported studies investigating either subjective or objective evaluations of prospective memory have shown inconsistent data. In this study, we aimed to verify the presence of gender differences during the performance of an objective prospective memory test by considering the weight of specific variables such as length of delay, type of response, and type of cue. We submitted a sample of 100 healthy Italian participants (50 men and 50 women) to a test expressly developed to assess prospective memory: The Memory for Intentions Screening Test. Women performed better than men in remembering to do an event-based task (i.e., prompted by an external event) and when the task required a physical response modality. We discuss the behavioural differences that emerged by considering the possible role of sociological, biological, neuroanatomical, and methodological variables.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-74
Number of pages10
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Apr 8 2015

Fingerprint

Episodic Memory
Cues
Healthy Volunteers
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Gender differences
  • Memory for intentions
  • Prospective memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Women outperform men in remembering to remember. / Palermo, Liana; Cinelli, Maria Cristina; Piccardi, Laura; Ciurli, Paola; Incoccia, Chiara; Zompanti, Laura; Guariglia, Cecilia.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 1, 08.04.2015, p. 65-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Palermo, Liana ; Cinelli, Maria Cristina ; Piccardi, Laura ; Ciurli, Paola ; Incoccia, Chiara ; Zompanti, Laura ; Guariglia, Cecilia. / Women outperform men in remembering to remember. In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 69, No. 1. pp. 65-74.
@article{43cbf59054ce4807be09ceafa3e69717,
title = "Women outperform men in remembering to remember",
abstract = "The study of gender differences in prospective memory (i.e., remembering to remember) has received modest attention in the literature. The few reported studies investigating either subjective or objective evaluations of prospective memory have shown inconsistent data. In this study, we aimed to verify the presence of gender differences during the performance of an objective prospective memory test by considering the weight of specific variables such as length of delay, type of response, and type of cue. We submitted a sample of 100 healthy Italian participants (50 men and 50 women) to a test expressly developed to assess prospective memory: The Memory for Intentions Screening Test. Women performed better than men in remembering to do an event-based task (i.e., prompted by an external event) and when the task required a physical response modality. We discuss the behavioural differences that emerged by considering the possible role of sociological, biological, neuroanatomical, and methodological variables.",
keywords = "Gender differences, Memory for intentions, Prospective memory",
author = "Liana Palermo and Cinelli, {Maria Cristina} and Laura Piccardi and Paola Ciurli and Chiara Incoccia and Laura Zompanti and Cecilia Guariglia",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/17470218.2015.1023734",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "65--74",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women outperform men in remembering to remember

AU - Palermo, Liana

AU - Cinelli, Maria Cristina

AU - Piccardi, Laura

AU - Ciurli, Paola

AU - Incoccia, Chiara

AU - Zompanti, Laura

AU - Guariglia, Cecilia

PY - 2015/4/8

Y1 - 2015/4/8

N2 - The study of gender differences in prospective memory (i.e., remembering to remember) has received modest attention in the literature. The few reported studies investigating either subjective or objective evaluations of prospective memory have shown inconsistent data. In this study, we aimed to verify the presence of gender differences during the performance of an objective prospective memory test by considering the weight of specific variables such as length of delay, type of response, and type of cue. We submitted a sample of 100 healthy Italian participants (50 men and 50 women) to a test expressly developed to assess prospective memory: The Memory for Intentions Screening Test. Women performed better than men in remembering to do an event-based task (i.e., prompted by an external event) and when the task required a physical response modality. We discuss the behavioural differences that emerged by considering the possible role of sociological, biological, neuroanatomical, and methodological variables.

AB - The study of gender differences in prospective memory (i.e., remembering to remember) has received modest attention in the literature. The few reported studies investigating either subjective or objective evaluations of prospective memory have shown inconsistent data. In this study, we aimed to verify the presence of gender differences during the performance of an objective prospective memory test by considering the weight of specific variables such as length of delay, type of response, and type of cue. We submitted a sample of 100 healthy Italian participants (50 men and 50 women) to a test expressly developed to assess prospective memory: The Memory for Intentions Screening Test. Women performed better than men in remembering to do an event-based task (i.e., prompted by an external event) and when the task required a physical response modality. We discuss the behavioural differences that emerged by considering the possible role of sociological, biological, neuroanatomical, and methodological variables.

KW - Gender differences

KW - Memory for intentions

KW - Prospective memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955211179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955211179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2015.1023734

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2015.1023734

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84955211179

VL - 69

SP - 65

EP - 74

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 1

ER -