Wrong guidelines: How to detect them and what to do in the case of flawed recommendations

Primiano Iannone, Giorgio Costantino, Nicola Montano, Gian Marco Podda, Monica Minardi, James Doyle, Antonino Cartabellotta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Any evidence-based recommendation needs careful assessment of its methodological background as well as of its content trustworthiness, especially given that following it will not necessarily produce the intended clinical outcomes. There are no established instruments to evaluate guidelines for their content, while useful tools assessing the quality of methods followed are well recognised and adopted. We suggest a 'safety bundle' considering methodological aspects and content trustworthiness of guidelines, by adopting the GRADE method in a backward fashion. Sharing the critical analysis of the guidelines with patients, including any eventual uncertainty about them, is of key importance in order to avoid the possible adverse effects derived from following the wrong guidelines. Such critical approach is also helpful and beneficial in producing better care pathways, health policy decisions and more relevant and ethical research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-8
JournalEvidence-Based Medicine
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Needs Assessment
Health Policy
Uncertainty
Safety
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wrong guidelines : How to detect them and what to do in the case of flawed recommendations. / Iannone, Primiano; Costantino, Giorgio; Montano, Nicola; Podda, Gian Marco; Minardi, Monica; Doyle, James; Cartabellotta, Antonino.

In: Evidence-Based Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2017, p. 4-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iannone, Primiano ; Costantino, Giorgio ; Montano, Nicola ; Podda, Gian Marco ; Minardi, Monica ; Doyle, James ; Cartabellotta, Antonino. / Wrong guidelines : How to detect them and what to do in the case of flawed recommendations. In: Evidence-Based Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 4-8.
@article{982f4b62f65a42a4b086961b360fe7bb,
title = "Wrong guidelines: How to detect them and what to do in the case of flawed recommendations",
abstract = "Any evidence-based recommendation needs careful assessment of its methodological background as well as of its content trustworthiness, especially given that following it will not necessarily produce the intended clinical outcomes. There are no established instruments to evaluate guidelines for their content, while useful tools assessing the quality of methods followed are well recognised and adopted. We suggest a 'safety bundle' considering methodological aspects and content trustworthiness of guidelines, by adopting the GRADE method in a backward fashion. Sharing the critical analysis of the guidelines with patients, including any eventual uncertainty about them, is of key importance in order to avoid the possible adverse effects derived from following the wrong guidelines. Such critical approach is also helpful and beneficial in producing better care pathways, health policy decisions and more relevant and ethical research.",
author = "Primiano Iannone and Giorgio Costantino and Nicola Montano and Podda, {Gian Marco} and Monica Minardi and James Doyle and Antonino Cartabellotta",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1136/ebmed-2016-110607",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "4--8",
journal = "Evidence-Based Medicine",
issn = "1356-5524",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wrong guidelines

T2 - How to detect them and what to do in the case of flawed recommendations

AU - Iannone, Primiano

AU - Costantino, Giorgio

AU - Montano, Nicola

AU - Podda, Gian Marco

AU - Minardi, Monica

AU - Doyle, James

AU - Cartabellotta, Antonino

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Any evidence-based recommendation needs careful assessment of its methodological background as well as of its content trustworthiness, especially given that following it will not necessarily produce the intended clinical outcomes. There are no established instruments to evaluate guidelines for their content, while useful tools assessing the quality of methods followed are well recognised and adopted. We suggest a 'safety bundle' considering methodological aspects and content trustworthiness of guidelines, by adopting the GRADE method in a backward fashion. Sharing the critical analysis of the guidelines with patients, including any eventual uncertainty about them, is of key importance in order to avoid the possible adverse effects derived from following the wrong guidelines. Such critical approach is also helpful and beneficial in producing better care pathways, health policy decisions and more relevant and ethical research.

AB - Any evidence-based recommendation needs careful assessment of its methodological background as well as of its content trustworthiness, especially given that following it will not necessarily produce the intended clinical outcomes. There are no established instruments to evaluate guidelines for their content, while useful tools assessing the quality of methods followed are well recognised and adopted. We suggest a 'safety bundle' considering methodological aspects and content trustworthiness of guidelines, by adopting the GRADE method in a backward fashion. Sharing the critical analysis of the guidelines with patients, including any eventual uncertainty about them, is of key importance in order to avoid the possible adverse effects derived from following the wrong guidelines. Such critical approach is also helpful and beneficial in producing better care pathways, health policy decisions and more relevant and ethical research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007256452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007256452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110607

DO - 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110607

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85007256452

VL - 22

SP - 4

EP - 8

JO - Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - Evidence-Based Medicine

SN - 1356-5524

IS - 1

ER -